The acrylic claws are out again in the TAMMY TAYLOR trade mark ownership dispute in South Africa. This time it was the Pretoria High Court adding a fresh coat of polish to the matter in Lebohang Likotsi Hlathuka v Tammy Taylor Global Franchising (Pty) Ltd & Others. It handed down a glossy order, directing, amongst other things, that Melany and Peet Viljoen cease using the TAMMY TAYLOR trade mark in South Africa.

Buffing out the facts

Hlathuka, the applicant, believed she’d purchased a lucrative Tammy Taylor nail salon franchise for R600,000. But instead of a plush salon with pretty profits, she was left clipped and confused when reports surfaced, alleging that the Viljoens had no legal right to use or license the TAMMY TAYLOR trade mark in South Africa.

Hoping to claw back her investment, Ms Hlathuka took the matter to court. Her argument? That, among other things, Tammy Taylor, Inc (“Tammy Taylor US”), is the rightful owner of the TAMMY TAYLOR trade mark and that the Viljoens had no legal authority to use and/or license the TAMMY TAYLOR trade mark in South Africa.

She conducted a search of the Trade Marks Register, confirming that Tammy Taylor US is the registered owner of the following trade marks in South Africa:

 Trade Mark  Status  Proprietor
 TAMMY TAYLOR  Registered  Tammy Taylor, Inc
 tammy taylor south africa  Registered  Tammy Taylor, Inc
tammy taylor south africa  Provisionally Refused  Tammy Taylor, Inc

She noted that Justsmart Mobile (Pty) Ltd, a company solely directed by Melany Viljoen, had previously filed applications to register TAMMY TAYLOR SOUTH AFRICA and TAMMY TAYLOR NAILS SOUTH AFRICA logos (shown below), only for those applications to later be assigned to Tammy Taylor US.

TAMMY TAYLOR Trade Mark, TAMMY TAYLOR Trade Mark Tussle: Court Order on Franchise Dispute

tammy taylor SA

The Viljoens also filed trade mark applications to register the TAMMY TAYLOR GLOBAL FRANCHISING trade mark. However, a search of the Trade Mark Register revealed that the Registrar provisionally refused these applications, because they were confusingly similar to the existing registered trade marks owned by Tammy Taylor US.

In seeking relief, Ms Hlathuka asked the court to, among other things, prohibit the Viljoens from continuing to use the TAMMY TAYLOR trade mark and/or to sell or operate any further franchises under the trade mark without the authorisation of Tammy Taylor US.

The court’s order

Granting Ms Hlathuka some very welcome relief, the court ordered, among other things, that:

  • The respondents must repay the applicant with the amount she invested, being R600 000, with interest calculated from the date payment was demanded.
  • The respondents must immediately “cease representing or holding out to the public that they have the legal authority and right to sell Tammy Taylor Nail Franchises in South Africa」。
  • The respondents are restrained from “selling Tammy Taylor franchises in South Africa, alternatively any nail salon that incorporates or uses the Tammy Taylor name of trade marks」。
  • The respondents must “remove all references to “Tammy Taylor” from their marketing materials, websites, products, and social media within 30 days from the date of the order”.

A nail-biting turn on appeal:

Unwilling to let the polish dry, the Viljoens’ have filed an appeal against the court order, putting the brakes on its immediate enforcement and keeping this trade mark tussle alive.

A polished lesson in trade mark law:

This matter is a reminder that unauthorised use of a registered trade mark is far from a cosmetic issue – it’s a commercial risk with serious legal consequences. The court’s order underscores that respecting the trade mark rights of others is not just a legal obligation, it’s also a strategic business imperative. While Ms Hlathuka has been successful so far, this is also a reminder to prospective franchisees to conduct a due diligence on their franchisors and be certain they actually have the rights they are offering to license. The last thing you want when investing in a franchise is to get caught up in a legal drama.